calendar_today Bar Review Question of the Day By Pieper Bar Review

May 16 2022 Question Of The Day


A state had a policy of hiring new state employees on a provisional basis for a six-month period. A new employee would be granted civil service status if the job performance was satisfactory and a permanent position became available. The state did not follow a consistent pattern with respect to termination of provisional employees; indeed, some were summarily terminated, while others were given hearings upon notice, during which their job performance as provisional employees was discussed. A provisional employee who was terminated without a hearing challenged the constitutionality of the state’s action. Should the court rule in favor of the employee?

(A) Yes, because the state’s action amounts to a bill of attainder.

(B) Yes, because the inconsistent nature of the state’s discharge procedure denies her equal protection of the law.

(C) No, because the employee does not have a right to notice and a hearing protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

(D) No, because a state’s procedure with respect to state employees is a matter reserved to the state under the Tenth Amendment.



© Pieper Bar Review. Questions and answers are the property of Pieper Bar Review intended for the individual use of Question of the Day subscribers and cannot be redistributed without the express, written consent of Pieper Bar Review.